| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Court | Orange County Superior Court, Central Justice Center, Dept. C61 |
| Case No. | 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC |
| Bench Officer | Commissioner Carmen D. Snuggs-Spraggins |
| Case Type | Unlawful Detainer — Residential (Limited Civil) |
| Property | 19235 Brynn Court, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 |
| Tenancy Period | May 1, 2022 – August 5, 2024 (voluntary vacate; no sheriff lockout) |
| Parallel Fraud Case | Huynh v. Tran/Ly · OC Sup. Ct. 30-2025-01502635-CU-FR-CJC (filed 8/8/2025; ArentFox Schiff for plaintiff; Mike N. Vo APLC for Anna Ly) |
| Prior Pattern Case | Harman v. Tran · OC Sup. Ct. 30-2021-01237695 · same Dept. C61 · same property · same plaintiff's counsel · UD-120 false certification |
| Person | Capacity | License / Bar No. | Referral Tracks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phat L.K. Tran, D.M.D. | Property owner / Landlord / UD Plaintiff | NPI #1184847162; $11.3M+ property network | Criminal · Civil · Federal · §3439.04 fraudulent transfer (Smart Invest HB LLC, Oct 2025) |
| Anna Tran Ly | 2022 listing agent; move-out invoicing agent; believed to be a daughter of Phat L.K. Tran (relationship not independently verified) | DRE Broker #01894348 (issued 1/28/2011 — independent broker; Sun Realty DBA expired 2/24/2015; defunct signage still displayed May 2022) | Criminal · Civil · DRE · FTB/EDD (untaxed-brokerage referral pending compensation-flow verification) |
| Hanson Tri Le | 2024 listing agent / broker / property manager | DRE Broker #01358448; in 2024 via Springdale Marina Inc. dba BHHS California Properties (corporate Lic. #01208606) — affiliation detached 5/13/2024; current Broker Associate, Stratton-LFCA Inc. (DO Dennis A. Rosas) | Criminal · Civil · DRE Pre-Complaint #1-26-0304-002 |
| Steven D. Silverstein, Esq. | Counsel for landlord (UD action) | CA Bar #86466; Silverstein Eviction Law, Tustin | Criminal · Civil · State Bar OCTC |
| David Ly | Contractor of record (Ly Construction) | CSLB #1068334, B-General, Sole Ownership | Civil · CSLB |
| Angie M. Sandoval | Branch Manager, BHHS California Properties (5848 Edinger Ave HB 92649) | DRE #01130478; current address 120 5th St Ste C110 HB 92648 | Civil · DRE — supervisory liability under §10159.2; on direct notice 6/25/2024 |
| Dennis A. Rosas | Designated Officer, Stratton-LFCA Inc. (BHHS DBA) | DRE Broker #00602101; DO of Stratton-LFCA #02211662 | Civil · DRE — designated-officer liability |
| Iris F. Tonti | Division Manager, BHHS (above Sandoval) | DRE #00844023 | Civil · DRE |
| Richard J. Rosiak, Esq. | Former defense counsel (withdrew 3 calendar days pre-trial) | CA Bar #141430; sole principal marketing as "Richard J. Rosiak & Associates" | State Bar — Under Formal Review, Examiner Devin Urbany; no finding has been made |
| Smart Invest HB LLC | Transferee entity, 20012 Sand Dune Lane (Oct 2025) | CA SOS B20250360378 | Civil (fraudulent transfer §3439.04) |
| White Bear Investments LLC | Entity identified in Huynh v. Tran/Ly | OC Sup. Ct. filing | Civil |
| Thao Thu Tran | believed to be a sister of Phat L.K. Tran (not independently verified); named in Tran v. Bach (2018) | OC Sup. Ct. 30-2018-00982394 | Investigative (sibling network) |
Kitchen drain relocated inside wall cavity above dishwasher electrical outlet — unpermitted. Leak saturated wall, corroded electrical, grew mold for ~10 years before listing. Condition undisclosed at sale or rental.
Property listed as "NEW carpet, NEW paint, Ready to move in" with known mold, defective electrical, roof leak, rotten subfloor — all pre-existing. Eight gallons Glidden Premium paint found in garage post-eviction — consistent with cosmetic concealment over substantive defect.
Before plaintiff took occupancy, Tran's townhouse dishwasher had failed preceding move-in and had standing water on delivery of keys to tenants. Plaintiff complained about the mold defect to facilitate the move-in transition. The same dishwasher would later fail again and be determined by Berkshire Hathaway to be defective in the 25th month of tenancy (EVENT 3.2), and remained questionable across contractor visits and into the 2024 lease with Hanson Le. The Ly Construction bill establishes that Tran's documentary billing pattern predates the tenancy by at least one cycle.
Anna Tran Ly held California Broker License DRE #01894348 (issued 1/28/2011 — broker level, not salesperson). At the time of the April 2022 listing, transaction, and lease execution, she was operating without an active registered place of business under the Sun Realty DBA, which had expired 2/24/2015 — more than seven years prior. Signage and listing identification continued to display "Sun Realty" notwithstanding the expired fictitious business name registration. No corporate trust account was designated for the transaction; deposits routed direct to Phat L.K. Tran's personal Wells Fargo account #1005959166 (EVENT 2.5), bypassing the broker trust-fund mandate. Concurrently, Ly performed property-management functions (tenant communications, payment instructions, document drafting), creating a dual capacity never separately licensed or accounted for. The contemporaneous channel was a personal Yahoo address (lymyhoa@yahoo.com) and personal cellular number — no brokerage domain, no firm letterhead, no license number on transmittals.
First lease executed via DocuSign (Envelope E1408B26). Rent $5,000/mo. No Pet Addendum. Payment to Phat Tran personally at 20012 Sand Dune Lane. Move-in total $10,375. Three named residents including Tetyana Zvyagintseva (LEP, 65+).
Text from (949) 923-5679 (attributed to Anna Ly by DRE license records and her email of record): "There's no dog addendum, landlord prefers tenants without dogs, we left it out to make it easy for you." Characterizes deliberate omission from an already-executed instrument.
Email lymyhoa@yahoo.com proposes "revised lease contract." $1,000 deposit due same day; wire to WF #1005959166 (Phat Tran). Move-in total increases $1,000 over executed Document A. Sent from personal Yahoo, no DRE license number, no brokerage domain.
Second lease executed (Envelope 5D80110C) by all four parties within 21 minutes of Anna Ly's email. Pet Addendum added ($1,000 pet deposit), personal check option removed, keys/garage line raised $75 → $375. Total move-in cost raised $10,375 → $11,375. Tenancy had not yet commenced.
$1,000 wire, WF Confirmation #OW00002146396360. Establishes the 26-month-continuous rent-receiving account — the same account used on the June 21, 2024 Three-Day Notice (EVENT 6.1) and the 6/28/2024 off-contract wire (EVENT 8.1).
Geotagged iOS photograph shows mature black mold colonies in under-sink kitchen cabinet — 39 minutes after arrival. Mold predates tenancy. Condition undisclosed at listing.
"There may be a problem in the kitchen wiring — the dishwasher did not turn on and was full of water… I know it was just finished construction." Personal admission of constructive knowledge of defect made as listing agent who declared unit "ready to move in" six days earlier.
Email gasio77@yahoo.com to kyphat@yahoo.com documenting defective outlet and dishwasher full of water at move-in. Owner's repair-duty clock commences.
Four repair visits by David Ly. Visit 3 revealed jumped circuits, doubled conductors — unpermitted work. Visit 4: David Ly told 72-year-old tenant on cardiac monitor to replace all light switches himself from Home Depot rather than arranging licensed electrical remediation. No written disclosure of dangerous conditions on any visit.
Landlord stopped paying contracted gardener. HOA (whose CC&Rs mandate yard maintenance) gave plaintiff a push mower and delegated maintenance to the 72-year-old tenant wearing a cardiac monitor. Phat Tran was simultaneously ~1 year in arrears on HOA dues while raising tenant rent 7%.
Tenant reports dishwasher failed. Same appliance that was full of water at move-in 5/2022, never definitively repaired across four contractor visits. Notice restarts the §1942 repair clock.
Phone call — Michael Gasio tells Phat Tran they intend to vacate end of April 2024. Owner asks them to stay, promises to fix property issues (corroborated by 4/2 email).
Confirmed verbatim from screen capture: "Hi Michael, sorry to text you at this time, it s a little late at night, I just decided to hire a manager to take care the pro[p]erty, he ll call you…" Presents incoming manager as a "hire to take care the property" — not a new lease, not a new rate, not a new lessor.
Email kyphat@yahoo.com: "please do not think we're looking new lessee." Affirmative written representation that no lease substitution was intended — made 24 days before a new lease was executed.
"The name of the manager is Hanson Le, he will contact you soon Michael." No mention of new lease, new rate, new payment account.
Text to Hanson Le: "Sorry mother-in-law doesn't speak English wife won't be home." Written notice that Tetyana Zvyagintseva (lease §1.B named resident) was LEP. No translated lease review was arranged before April 26 execution.
SMS from Hanson Le ("Property Manager") to plaintiff: "Hello Mr Gasio, Please forward to me your rental application. Thank you!" By April 25, 2024, plaintiff had been in continuous occupancy at 19235 Brynn Ct for 23 months (May 2022 onward). A rental application is the qualification instrument for a new prospective tenant — it has no function in a true renewal. The application demand contradicts the "renewal" framing in EVENTS 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.10A, and is consistent only with treating the transaction as a new-tenancy creation — the frame under Cal. Civ. Code §1947.12(c)(4) that resets rent below the cap.
Hanson Le attends with handyman. Text at 5:25 PM confirms attendance. Dishwasher not repaired. Second documented failure to repair the same appliance first reported May 2022.
Wire sent 11:51 AM with memo "New lease 24 one payment at 5000." Two minutes later, Phat Tran texts: "We are filling out new paper work understand one at old lease 5000 then new payment 5350." Owner acknowledges wire as a payment at the old rate for May 2024. The Move-Out Clearance Report later claims rent was only paid through May 1, 2024 — directly contradicted by this acknowledged wire — creating the "Missing Month" arithmetic discrepancy.
Email subject "Witches burnt Broom" from gasio77@yahoo.com to hansonle@bhhscaprops.com, sixteen hours before Hanson Le's 4/26 9:53 AM "one year lease agreement" text (EVENT 4.10A). Four anchors:
(i) Term-understanding statement, verbatim: "I paid the payment of $5,000 last week for 5-24 there are 11 payments remain at $5,350." Expresses the operative consent baseline — 1 payment at $5,000 (May 2024 prior-lease rate) + 11 at $5,350 = 12 months total. The executed instrument carried a 13-month term. Le received the statement in writing and did not correct it before transmitting the 4/26 "one year lease agreement" confirmation.
(ii) Comprehensive financial-position disclosure (screenshots time-stamped 11:03, 11:11, 11:13 — sent 11:18): WF Premier Checking ...0732 $5,082.91; WF Platinum Savings ...2803 $4,069.89; WF Time Account ...5611 $106,786.72; WF WellsTrade ...5997 $814,024.15; Barclays Jumbo CD ...1469 $230,894.36 (5.15% APY, maturity 2/27/2025); Fidelity Fresno Unified 403(b) plan #51659 $512,829.85; FICO Score 9 (Experian, 4/20/2024) 799 "Very Good." Aggregate disclosed: approximately $1,673,687.97. Account ending 0732 is the same account that later transmitted the 6/28/2024 $5,350 wire (EVENT 8.1) — Le had the source-account identifier 64 days pre-wire.
(iii) Household and professional-standing context: Plaintiff identifies Yulia Gasio as adjunct professor at CSULB, with hyperlinks to her CSULB Academia.edu profile and her Ukrainian Institute of Modern Art "Donbas 2014-present" exhibition. Establishes (a) Yulia's status as named co-tenant with documented employment; (b) two professionals and one named LEP elder occupant in household; (c) Le's actual notice of Yulia's co-tenancy and CSULB position 62 days before her omission from the 6/21/2024 Three-Day Notice (EVENT 6.1).
(iv) Cooperative posture: Opening line "I have the forms finally" — directly responsive to EVENT 4.5A's application request 7 hours, 26 minutes earlier.
Multi-text renewal proposal with contradictory effective dates (May 1, 2024 vs. June 1, 2024). Critically: "Also what bank do you use? So I can provide you my bank account number to transfer monthly rent to me instead of to the owner." First of two written personal-account solicitations.
As recalled by plaintiff and memorialized in plaintiff's contemporaneous writings: Hanson Le (a) proposed the April 19 wire be re-characterized as a notice to terminate; (b) acknowledged 60-day notice requirement; (c) said owner "couldn't afford" the notice period; (d) threatened eviction filing the following Monday if new lease not signed.
At 9:53 AM on April 26, 2024, hours before signatures were applied, Hanson Le SMS'd plaintiff: "Please check your email to review and sign our renewal lease agreement: — one year lease agreement — start date : 6/1/2024 — rent rate : $5,350/month." The document tendered carried §2.B termination date 06/30/2025 at 11 AM — a 13-month term. Plaintiff's 4/25 "Witches Burnt Broom" email (EVENT 4.8) — "11 payments remain at $5,350" — proves the 12-month understanding was held at execution. The discrepancy between represented term and executed term goes to the heart of consent.
C.A.R. Form RLMM Revised 12/23. DocuSign envelope titled "Revised renewal lease agreement" — contents are a new contract. Authentisign ID 46CC8725-F703-EF11-96F5-6045BDD68161. Form date 04/26/2024; signatures applied 04/27/2024 (Michael Gasio, Phat Tran) and 04/28/2024 (Yulia Gasio). Tetyana Zvyagintseva (named §1.B resident) did not initial or sign. Owner at trial acknowledged tenants "did not want to sign the lease." Documentary defects on the face of the executed instrument:
(a) Payment routing to broker's personal account (§3.D.1): "BANK: WELLS FARGO, NAME: HANSON LE, ACCOUNT #: 3312943297." Not a broker trust account.
(b) Rent-delivery name/phone/address fields blank (§3.D.2) — statutory disclosure of payment-receipt destination unsatisfied on the face.
(c) Security-deposit destination box unchecked (§4.A) — neither "Owner of the Premises" nor "Owner's Broker's trust account" selected.
(d) Move-In Costs ledger (§5): records $6,375 in deposits Payment Received ($5,000 security + $375 keys/garage + $1,000 pet), Payable To "Owner." Anchor for the move-out fraud analysis at EVENT 9.2.
(e) Internal agency-disclosure contradiction: §41.A names BHHS California Lic. #01208606 with "Housing Provider" agent box only. §41.B 1-year+ disclosure box unchecked despite 13-month term that triggers AD disclosure under §2079.16. Page 9 Real Estate Brokers Section lists the same brokerage on both Tenant and Housing Provider sides — implicit dual representation, undisclosed.
(f) Foreign-language translation (§§43, 49): §49 Interpreter/Translator box unchecked despite Le's pre-execution written acknowledgement of Tetyana Zvyagintseva as LEP (EVENT 4.5).
(g) Named §1.B occupant did not sign or initial: only MAG, YG, PKT initials present. Tetyana Zvyagintseva named but not bound and not provided translated review.
(h) Brokerage address inconsistency: cover identifies brokerage at "18000 Studebaker Rd, Ste 600 Huntington Beach CA 90703" — Studebaker Rd is in Bellflower. Pages 7 and 9 correctly state "5848 Edinger Ave, Huntington Beach, CA 92649." Discrepancy on a single instrument.
(i) Authentisign metadata anchor: Envelope ID is the subpoena target for Lone Wolf / Authentisign audit trail (timestamps, IPs, geolocation, viewer log, version history). Subpoena queued.
Other defects: no 30-day rent-increase notice under §827; no 60-day termination notice; +7% rent increase; LEP-occupant non-translation; Berkshire Hathaway corporate name stamped on the lease.
Same day as lease execution, Hanson Le texts: "Also what bank do you use? So I can provide you my bank account number to transfer monthly rent to me instead of to the owner." Second written solicitation. Combined with the lease designating WF #3312943297 in his personal name, creates a documented pattern of intentional personal-account rent diversion.
Same day — plaintiff texts Le: "You do not show the $6,000 deposit the $1,000 for the pet the $350 for the keys on the contract will we be receiving that back or getting credit in writing." Broker pivots to asking plaintiff's bank — never addresses the deposit question.
3:50 PM text: "I am no longer handling or managing this property from today 5/13/24." Simultaneously, DRE records confirm his Springdale Marina Inc. / BHHS corporate affiliation also detached on the same calendar date. Le withdraws without resolving the dishwasher he committed in writing to replace.
Le's DRE corporate brokerage authority through Springdale Marina Inc. / BHHS detached 5/13/2024 — the same day as his property-management withdrawal text. By the time the cashier's check arrived 5/30 at the BHHS office, Le held no corporate brokerage authority through that licensee. The check was made payable to BHHS as a corporate payee.
Home Depot order total $1,011.52 — exercise of Cal. Civ. Code §1942 repair-and-deduct. Dishwasher first reported broken March 5 (10+ weeks earlier). Cost documented by order confirmation.
WF cashier's check: $5,350 rent − $1,011.52 §1942 deduction = $4,338.48. Mailed USPS Certified in four 1-lb packages to BHHS, Huntington Beach. Home Depot invoice included as documentation.
Delivery confirmed 3:43 PM, ZIP 92649 (BHHS, 5848 Edinger Ave). "Delivered, Left with Individual." Signed "H H." Check payable to corporate BHHS — could only be applied through corporate brokerage accounting. Never deposited, never credited, never returned with explanation. Pre-notice tender: this delivery preceded the 6/21/2024 Three-Day Notice by 22 days; there was no active cure window at the time of tender because no notice existed. The notice was facially false from issuance.
Notice taped to front door, Friday evening. Confirmed by the face of the instrument (screen-captured copy of record):
Form: "3 DAY NOTICE TO PAY RENT OR QUIT." To: "MICHAEL GASIO ; DOES 1 TO 5." Property: "19235 BRYNN COURT, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648." Amount: $5,350.00 for "June 1st, 2024 to June 30th, 2024." Dated: 6/21/2024. Payee: "PHAT TRAN c/o WELLS FARGO BANK ACCT #1005959166." Delivery point: "WELLS FARGO BANK, 19840 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648." Phone: "(714) 390-2044." Signature: typed only "PHAT L.K. TRAN" — no handwritten signature anywhere on the instrument.
Account mismatch: WF #1005959166 (Phat Tran's personal) — not the WF #3312943297 designated by the 2024 lease. Neither is a broker trust account; the notice's selection unilaterally redirects from the lease's payment route.
No handwritten signature: the Harman companion notice bears Silverstein's handwritten signature; the Gasio notice bears none.
Failure to name known residents: Yulia Gasio (named lease co-tenant, CSULB adjunct professor disclosed to broker 4/25 — EVENT 4.8) is not named. Tetyana Zvyagintseva (named §1.B resident, LEP, 65+, disclosed in writing 4/2024 — EVENT 4.5) is not named. "DOES 1 TO 5" placeholder cannot substitute for known named adult occupants. Independent §1161 / §1162 defect.
Bank-branch delivery as personal-account funnel: notice channels rent directly to a public WF retail branch for deposit to a personal account — bypassing both broker trust-fund and the lease-designated payment route. Same account (#1005959166) used since 4/26/2022 (EVENT 2.5) and the 6/28/2024 wire (EVENT 8.1). Formalizes a 26-month-continuous personal-account routing pattern.
English-only service to LEP household: no translated companion notice.
Tender pre-existing: $4,338.48 cashier's check (EVENT 5.5) had been delivered to BHHS 22 days before the notice issued. The notice demands full gross rent as if no tender had occurred.
The cure tender (5/30 cashier's check, EVENT 5.5) had been delivered 22 days before the notice was served. The notice demands full gross rent as if no tender had occurred. The Harman comparison: the companion landlord-signed copy of the Three-Day Notice in the Harman case bears Silverstein's signature; the Gasio notice bears no handwritten signature.
SMS from Phat Tran within the cure window: (1) "sorry I did nt know you did pay your rent to the Hanson account" — owner did not know rent was received; (2) "I just texted him to find out" — no accounting from broker to owner; (3) "Hanson told me that you did nt want to sign the new lease" — broker gave owner false report about tenant consent; (4) "and I dont [re]ceive the payment so I sent…" — Notice was based on broker's false report. Plaintiff reasonably believed matter was resolved within the cure window. UD filed 11 days later anyway.
5:55–6:02 PM — seven text messages to (714) 600-7741 (personal cell of Angie Sandoval, BHHS Branch Manager, DRE #01130478): image of demand letter; HBPD notice language re BHHS name stamped on lease; ~$5,000 in broker custody. Sandoval placed on actual notice pre-filing.
WF Confirmation #OW00004652829145, memo: "Unknown Contract for July payment 27 of 37 on contracts." Wire from plaintiff's WF Premier Checking ...0732 (the same account disclosed to Le 4/25/2024, EVENT 4.8) to WF #1005959166 (Phat Tran's personal). Sent at 2:00 PM PT WF same-day cutoff; available balance at transmission $10,331.12.
From receipt on 6/28, Tran had four electronic return mechanisms available at zero cost and same-day execution at the same Wells Fargo branch infrastructure he himself designated on the 6/21 Three-Day Notice (EVENT 6.1):
Tran selected none. By close of business Wednesday, July 3, 2024, the three-business-day handling window (BPC §10145 by quasi-broker / unlicensed-recipient theory) had expired: 6/29 Sat / 6/30 Sun excluded; 7/1 Mon = day 1; 7/2 Tue = day 2; 7/3 Wed = day 3. On the same calendar day, Silverstein filed the UD complaint (EVENT 8.3). On July 9, 2024 at 10:08 AM, plaintiff transmitted a written notice email from gasio77@yahoo.com to HBPD (Det. Shawn Randell), FBI (hnguyen2@fbi.gov), OC DA (daoffice@ocdapa.org), cc: Silverstein Eviction Law (clerk@stevendsilverstein.com), bcc: DOJ Criminal Fraud Section (criminal.fraud@usdoj.gov) and Yulia Gasio. The email embedded the WF Review Transfer record and the §10145 / §10130 analysis. The funds were never electronically returned. Tran subsequently represented to the court (through Silverstein) that a refund had been mailed; USPS produced no proof of mailing.
Within 24 hours of plaintiff's 7/9/2024 multi-agency notice (EVENT 8.2), HBPD opened evidentiary intake. Plaintiff's Yahoo draft archive (screen-captured 2/18/2025) preserves the document-request thread under subject "Police want to known Do you have a copy of the contract," dated 7/10/2024, originating from "Erin Morris" and forwarded by plaintiff. The request — from law enforcement — for a copy of the executed 2024 lease establishes that HBPD treated the 7/9 notice as a viable criminal-referral predicate and initiated independent documentary collection within one business day. Plaintiff thereafter maintained a continuous draft-and-send communication chain through 2/18/2025 with Det. Shawn Randell, HBPD; Cuchilla, Jessica; Erin Morris; and Yulia Gasio under subject threads including "Did you take this to court? a Counterfeit contract using Identity" (Jan 23) and "Counterfeiting and Fraud with 'help of AI only' No lawyer never l[icensed]" (2/18 same-day draft). The continuity establishes that law-enforcement engagement on this matter has been active and bilateral since 7/10/2024 — not abandoned, not closed.
UD filed in OC Superior Court Dept. C61, 11 days after owner's written admission that the notice was based on broker's false report (EVENT 7.1), and on the same calendar day the BPC §10145 retention window expired (EVENT 8.2). Filed by Silverstein Eviction Law. Owner's cure-window admission not disclosed to the Court. The 6/28 wire not disclosed to the Court.
After the 6/28/2024 wire was accepted but represented to the court as refunded by mail without USPS proof, plaintiff issued a second payment under protest: WF cashier's check #0084412016, jointly payable to Phat L.K. Tran and Steven D. Silverstein, Esq., memo line marked "DUPLICATE." Instrument was negotiated and cleared. This is the instrument to which Silverstein's trial question "did you cash the check?" referred — the July 2024 rent payment, not the security deposit and not the 5/30 cure tender. The joint-payee structure placed counsel within the chain of funds custody and converts the "mailed refund" representation into a directly testable record.
On July 18, 2024, plaintiff transmitted a written designation establishing Yulia Gasio as communication authority for the matter, on disability/medical grounds. The designation is preserved as a historical evidentiary exhibit relating to defense counsel Richard J. Rosiak's later duty of communication under RPC 1.4(a)(3) and ADA reasonable-accommodation obligations. It does not reflect current operating reality — plaintiff Michael Gasio is the current direct contact (gasio77@yahoo.com). Offered for the limited purpose of establishing the communication-authority record at the time of Rosiak's January 10, 2025 mailbox-deposit withdrawal letter (EVENT 10.1).
City inspector visits 7/27/2024 — 18 days before the Ly Construction invoice is dated. Inspector confirms no pet damage and clean carpets. Establishes the fabrication sequence.
Move-Out Report executed by Anna Tran Ly. Ly had written 3/18/2023: "I no longer work for Phat Tran." She reappears as signatory 17 months later to execute a deduction instrument against the same tenants. Total charges claimed: $20,923. Claims include:
Net claimed against tenants: $14,548 after netting $6,375 in deposit credits — the same $6,375 acknowledged "Payment Received" on the executed 4/26/2024 lease (EVENT 4.11(d)).
Invoice dated August 14, 2024 — 9 days after plaintiff vacated (8/5/2024) and 18 days after the City of Huntington Beach inspector confirmed no pet damage and clean carpets (7/27/2024). Invoice amount $7,837. CSLB #1068334, B-General, sole ownership: David Ly. Invoice claims labor-hours that exceed working-day capacity within the documented window (time-and-labor impossibility on the face of the instrument). No pre-work photographs, no waste-haul receipts, no carpet-supplier invoice attached. Issued after the only neutral inspection in the record had documented the opposite condition.
Defense counsel Richard J. Rosiak (CA Bar #141430, sole principal marketing as "Richard J. Rosiak & Associates") deposited withdrawal communication to plaintiff's mailbox on a Friday for a Monday 1/13/2025 trial setting — three calendar days, two of them weekend, zero business days to substitute counsel.
Defense counsel did not appear.
Case continued through April 2025 with plaintiff pro se. Establishes the §1.4(a)(3) communication-failure window without conflation with the historical 7/18/2024 communication authority transfer to Yulia Gasio (EVENT 9.0 — exhibit only; Michael Gasio is current direct contact).
During HBPD interview connected to the active investigation activated 7/10/2024 (EVENT 8.2A), Hanson Le invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The invocation does not establish guilt but does establish that Le, on advice of counsel or own judgment, considered substantive answers about the 2024 lease, the rent-routing pattern, the 5/30 cashier's check, and the 5/13 withdrawal to carry criminal exposure.
Transfer occurred during active multi-agency referral phase. The transferee entity is controlled by Phat L.K. Tran. Badges of fraud present under §3439.04(a)(1)–(2): insider transferee, retention of possession/control inference, timing relative to known claims, suit pending or threatened, insufficient consideration. The conveyance occurred while the criminal referral campaign was active and after Le's January 2026 Fifth Amendment invocation (chronologically by referral activity, though the LLC formed earlier in 2025).
Fifth Reading · Draft Working Document · All Characterizations Are Allegations
Allegation framing. The matters presented on this portal are documentary questions for regulatory and judicial review. No finding has been made by any agency or court on the questions presented. State Bar matters identified in Section IV remain under formal review by the Office of Chief Trial Counsel; no finding has been made. The federal docket of record cited in the Silverstein dossier (Bea-Mone v. Silverstein, C.D. Cal. 8:17-cv-00550) was vacated on stipulation in October 2019 and dismissed with prejudice; there is no surviving public adjudication of liability in that matter.
Author disambiguation. “Silverstein” on this portal refers exclusively to Steven D. Silverstein, California State Bar #86466, principal of Silverstein Eviction Law, Tustin, California. No other person of similar name is implicated in any matter presented.
Author note. This portal is published pro se by Michael Gasio, a thirty-year California school administrator and former vice principal whose graduate coursework included evidence collection in law enforcement and law-related studies. The portal is published for counsel review, regulatory examination, and the convenience of investigators. It is not legal advice. It is not an advocacy site. It is the documentary record the plaintiff would tender to a court or agency on request, organized in advance for the convenience of the reviewer.
Inquiries. Inquiries from licensed counsel and accredited investigators are welcome. Contact: gasio77@yahoo.com · routing instructions are maintained on the Letter to Counsel page.
gasiomirror.com is published as press under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution of the State of California. The publisher is the author. Editorial control rests with the publisher.
The publisher selects what is published, when, and for how long. Prior editions are not retained on this site for public access — no more than any newspaper or magazine retains its back issues on its racks.
Historical preservation is the work of the Internet Archive, an independent institution. If back issues of this publication exist, they exist there, outside the publisher's hands. The publisher makes no representation about what any prior edition contained or whether any particular edition was captured.
Source documents are not held here. They are held by the Orange County Superior Court (Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC) and by the regulatory agencies catalogued under Agency Proceedings. Inquiries about source documents belong with them.
© 1996�ô2026 Michael A. Gasio. All rights reserved.
The contents of this website — including the editorial text, compilations, commentary, captions, photographs, screen captures, audio recordings, video recordings, the underlying HTML source code and stylesheets, the JavaScript, the SVG graphics, the embedded data structures, the document selection and arrangement, and the editorial sequencing of evidentiary exhibits — constitute the original work of the publisher and are protected as literary, pictorial, audiovisual, and compilation works under the following authorities:
This site is made publicly accessible at no charge as a public-interest record. Free access does not constitute a license, transfer, or waiver of any right reserved under 17 U.S.C. § 106. No portion of the publisher's exclusive rights is implied, granted, or extended by the act of public viewing.
Prohibited absent prior written authorization from the publisher:Primary-source documents authored by third parties — court filings, agency correspondence, recorded instruments, and other public records — are reproduced as evidentiary exhibits. The publisher does not claim copyright in those underlying public records. The publisher's copyright extends to the editorial compilation, the commentary, the captions, the arrangement, the selection, and all original works produced by the publisher.
Enforcement:The publisher will pursue all available legal remedies against any party who infringes the rights reserved herein. Available remedies include statutory damages under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), actual damages and disgorgement under 17 U.S.C. § 504(b), injunctive relief under 17 U.S.C. § 502, impoundment under 17 U.S.C. § 503, attorney's fees under 17 U.S.C. § 505, damages for circumvention under 17 U.S.C. § 1203, and civil and criminal penalties under California Penal Code § 502 and Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq.