The Gasio Mirror — A Free Press Publication
Huntington Beach, California Final Edition Friday, May 22, 2026
§Gasio v. Tran — Case File for Counsel Review
Silverstein Examination · Spoke 2 · Forms Library
Court
Orange County Superior Court
Venue
Dept. C61 · Comm. Snuggs-Spraggins
Case Number
30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC
Court
OC Superior Court · Dept. C61
Case Number
30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC
Bench Officer
Comm. Snuggs-Spraggins
Case Type
Unlawful Detainer — Limited Civil
Property
19235 Brynn Ct, Huntington Beach 92648
Tenancy
May 2022 — Aug 5, 2024 (28 months)
Outcome
Plaintiff vacated · sealed cure tender preserved
Primary Statutes
B&P §§10145, 10159.2, 10176, 10177(g) · Civ. Code §§1946, 1950.5
← Return to Case-File Index
Cover Source Screenshot Library Inventory Applied Instance Field Concordance Statutes
Special Section · Silverstein Examination · Spoke 2 of 3

Forms Library

The Move-Out Clearance Report applied against the Gasio tenancy on August 5, 2024 is published by name on the Silverstein Eviction Law firm website — in the Forms Library, under the “After Eviction” category. The template is firm property. The firm cannot disclaim it.

Five Templates · One Applied to Gasio DocuSign F5D247C2 · Aug 5, 2024 No Finding Has Been Made

This page documents the public-facing template-distribution channel of the Silverstein Eviction Law firm and identifies the published source of the Move-Out Clearance Report template applied against the Gasio tenancy. The keystone exhibit examined in detail at the hub page — DocuSign Envelope F5D247C2-A1A9-4991-B91F-6A333347A87D — is one filled-in instance of a form template the firm publishes by name on its own letterhead at stevendsilverstein.com.

The published source — firm-website screenshot

Source · stevendsilverstein.com · Forms Library · “After Eviction” Captured May 3, 2026
Silverstein Eviction Law Forms Library, After Eviction category, listing five form templates including Move Out Clearance Report
Silverstein Eviction Law · Forms Library · “After Eviction” category. Five form templates listed by name, including Move Out Clearance Report. Screenshot captured for public-service preservation May 3, 2026.

Library inventory — the “After Eviction” category

As of the May 3, 2026 capture, the Silverstein Eviction Law Forms Library “After Eviction” category lists the following five templates by name on the firm website:

Form template (verbatim) Anchor status Relationship to the case file
Abandoned Property Notice Not anchored to Gasio Not applied. Defendants vacated under documented Move-Out Clearance procedure on August 5, 2024; no abandonment determination was made or noticed.
Move Out Clearance Report Anchored — keystone exhibit Applied against the Gasio tenancy on August 5, 2024. DocuSign Envelope F5D247C2-A1A9-4991-B91F-6A333347A87D. Examined in detail at the hub page.
Notice of Belief of Abandonment Not anchored to Gasio Not applied. Same reason as the Abandoned Property Notice template above.
Notice of Sale of Abandoned Property Not anchored to Gasio Not applied. Same reason.
Possessions Left in Premises Not anchored to Gasio Not applied. Defendants vacated under documented procedure with no possessions left at the premises.

Source: Silverstein Eviction Law Forms Library, “After Eviction” category page on stevendsilverstein.com; firm-website screenshot captured May 3, 2026 and preserved in the case-file image archive.

The keystone match — one of five becomes one of one

Of the five templates the Silverstein Eviction Law firm publishes by name in its “After Eviction” category, one was applied against the Gasio tenancy: the Move Out Clearance Report. The applied instance is preserved as DocuSign Envelope F5D247C2-A1A9-4991-B91F-6A333347A87D, executed by Anna Ly on August 5, 2024, transmitted four-party at 11:16 PM PDT on August 22, 2024 from lymyhoa@yahoo.com to clerk@stevendsilverstein.com and three other recipients.

The four-party August 22 transmittal placed defense counsel of record on documentary notice of the executed instrument’s contents. The instrument carries the same document title — Move Out Clearance Report — that the firm publishes on the “After Eviction” library page. The structural form fields are common to both: Resident Name(s), Property Address, Forwarding Address, Original Move-in Date, 30/60 Day Notice Or Three Date Notice Given Date, Vacated, Rent Paid Through, CREDITS, CHARGES, Attorney Fees, Total Charges, Security Deposit Credit, Total Due, Property Management Use.

Document identity — applied instance

Move Out Clearance Report · Applied Instance · August 5, 2024
Template Source
Silverstein Eviction Law Forms Library
stevendsilverstein.com · “After Eviction”
DocuSign Envelope ID
F5D247C2-A1A9-4991-B91F-6A333347A87D
Executed By
Anna Ly · DRE Broker License #01894348
Execution Date
August 5, 2024
Property Address
19235 Brynn Court, Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Resident(s) Named
Michael A. Gasio · Yulia S. Gasio
Four-Party Transmittal
August 22, 2024 · 11:16 PM PDT
From: lymyhoa@yahoo.com
To: clerk@stevendsilverstein.com (and three others)
Companion Document
Ly Construction Invoice #2412 · dated August 14, 2024 — nine days after Move-Out execution · same DocuSign envelope

Blank template vs filled instrument — structural concordance

The blank template structure published in the Forms Library and the filled instrument in DocuSign Envelope F5D247C2 share the same field architecture. The eight structural fields below establish that the executed instrument is a populated instance of the firm-distributed template, not a one-off document drafted from scratch:

Template field (per firm-distributed structure) Filled value (per DocuSign F5D247C2) Documentary tension noted
Resident Name(s) Michael A Gasio, Yulia S Gasio Tetyana Zvyagintseva, named as a resident at ¶ 1.B of both the 2022 and 2024 leases, is omitted from the resident-name field.
Property Address 19235 Brynn Ct., Huntington Beach CA 92648 No tension.
Original Move-in Date 05/01/2022 No tension.
30/60 Day Notice Or Three Date Notice Given Date [blank] Required field left blank by Anna Ly at execution. The Three-Day Notice was served June 21, 2024 (taped to the front door, Friday evening). The form’s own notice-date field demands this date and was not populated.
Vacated 08/05/2024 No tension.
Rent Paid Through 05/01/2024 A “Paid-Through” date of 05/01/2024 against a vacate date of 08/05/2024, at the form-stated rent of $5,000/month, computes to three months and five days — $15,833 at the form’s arithmetic. The form demands $10,833. Gap: $5,000 — one full month silently dropped from the dollar column. The April 19, 2024 Wells Fargo wire OW00004382456864 names the month as May 2024.
Rent Amount $5,000/month The form-stated rent of $5,000/month does not match the $5,350/month figure recited in the April 26, 2024 lease and demanded by the June 21, 2024 Three-Day Notice. Two firm-prepared documents in the same case file recite different monthly rent figures.
Attorney Fees $2,005 Pre-printed line on the firm-distributed template. Deducted from the security deposit on August 5, 2024. No judgment had been entered as of August 5, 2024. Trial did not occur until January 27, 2025; Under Submission Ruling not until March 27, 2025. Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5(b) enumerates permitted security-deposit deductions; attorney fees are not included.

Sources: Silverstein Eviction Law Forms Library page (firm-website screenshot, May 3, 2026; Internet Archive Wayback Machine capture, May 18, 2026, timestamp 20260519004558); Move Out Clearance Report DocuSign Envelope F5D247C2-A1A9-4991-B91F-6A333347A87D (executed August 5, 2024); Ly Construction Invoice #2412 (dated August 14, 2024); 2022 and 2024 Residential Lease Agreements (DocuSign envelopes referenced at Section 5).

Provenance — the firm cannot disclaim the template

The template-distribution premise is established on the four corners of the firm’s own website. The “After Eviction” library page lists Move Out Clearance Report by name. A reasonable counsel, examiner, or journalist visiting stevendsilverstein.com on the date of capture would see the template offered by the firm under firm letterhead, available for download or use by clients of the firm. The applied instance preserved as DocuSign Envelope F5D247C2 carries the same document title at its head and the same structural field architecture beneath.

The state of the firm website on May 18, 2026 is preserved in the Internet Archive at timestamp 20260519004558 (web.archive.org/web/20260519004558/https://www.stevendsilverstein.com/). The capture records 192 elements of stevendsilverstein.com, including the firm homepage; the “Eviction Kings” Orange County landing page; the firm’s Orange County city-level eviction pages (Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa, Anaheim, Garden Grove, Yorba Linda, Aliso Viejo, Santa Ana, Cypress, Fountain Valley, Laguna Niguel, San Juan Capistrano); the firm’s San Bernardino County evictions page; the Eviction Help parent page; the Why You Need an Aggressive Attorney for Your Evictions subpage; the California AB 1482 Tenant Protection Act page; and the firm contact, resources, and forms-library directory pages. Historical preservation is the work of the Internet Archive, an independent institution. The published state of the firm website on that date is held outside the publisher’s hands and outside the firm’s hands.

Three independent procedural corroborators of the firm-distribution model also exist in the case file: (1) the Silverstein Eviction Law instructional video Service of 3 Day Notice, in which Steven D. Silverstein states verbatim, “This is the form that’s on my website that you can easily download”; (2) the firm-published procedural sheet Evictions: Procedures for an Unlawful Detainer After the Served Notice Expires, distributed under firm letterhead; (3) the Silverstein Eviction Law site sitelinks visible in standard Google search results, which surface the “Forms Library” and “Service of 3 Day Notice” pages as direct child pages of the firm domain. These three corroborators are examined in detail at Spoke 1 · Procedure.

Governing statutory provisions

California provisions applicable to the firm-distribution channel and the applied instance

Scope of this section. This page documents the firm-website Forms Library directory as the published source of the Move Out Clearance Report template applied against the Gasio tenancy. The keystone exhibit — DocuSign Envelope F5D247C2-A1A9-4991-B91F-6A333347A87D — is examined in detail at the hub page. Procedural corroboration of the firm-distribution model (instructional video transcripts, firm-published procedural sheets, firm-website article anchors) is examined at Spoke 1 · Procedure. The marketing posture of the firm in relation to the documentary record is examined at Spoke 3 · Marketing Posture. The plaintiffs assert no conclusion as to whether the firm-distribution model itself constitutes a violation of statute or rule of professional conduct; those determinations are reserved to qualified counsel, regulatory agencies, and the courts. Mr. Silverstein referenced throughout this page is Steven D. Silverstein, California State Bar #86466. Any reference to Steven A. Silverstein, California State Bar #130763, is to a different attorney unrelated to this matter. No finding has been made.

Notice to reader · scope and disclaimers

This site is a public-interest case file assembled and published by Michael A. Gasio, plaintiff pro se in Gasio v. Tran et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC. The plaintiff is not an attorney. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice.

Every factual assertion is drawn from primary documents — executed contracts, bank records, emails, text messages, court filings, public licensing records, public-records directory entries, and publicly-available firm-website materials — preserved in the case file and referenced by source and date. The firm-website screenshot reproduced above was captured for public-service preservation purposes on the date stated; the screenshot is presented as the page state on the date of capture and no representation is made as to its current state.

No statement should be read as a determination that any named person has committed a crime, violated a statute, or breached a professional duty. Those determinations are reserved to qualified counsel, regulatory agencies, and the courts.

This publication is made in the exercise of rights protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 2 of the California Constitution, California Civil Code § 47(d), and the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.

Caption
Gasio v. Tran et al.
OC Superior Court · Dept. C61
Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC
Publication
The Gasio Mirror
A Free Press Publication
Huntington Beach, California 92646
Discipline
Facts-only prosecutor format
Allegation framing throughout
Where regulatory matters remain pending, no finding has been made
Inquiries
gasio77@yahoo.com
Plaintiffs: Michael & Yulia Gasio
Coded by Black Diamond ❄ Project 2026 ™ · version 5.5
gasiomirror.com · © 1996–2026 · Plaintiffs: Michael & Yulia Gasio
§Publisher’s Notice & Copyright Reservation

gasiomirror.com is published as press under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution of the State of California. The publisher is the author. Editorial control rests with the publisher.

The publisher selects what is published, when, and for how long. Prior editions are not retained on this site for public access — no more than any newspaper or magazine retains its back issues on its racks.

Historical preservation is the work of the Internet Archive, an independent institution. If back issues of this publication exist, they exist there, outside the publisher’s hands. The publisher makes no representation about what any prior edition contained or whether any particular edition was captured.

Source documents are not held here. They are held by the Orange County Superior Court (Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC) and by the regulatory agencies catalogued under Agency Proceedings. Inquiries about source documents belong with them.

©Copyright Reservation

© 1996–2026 Michael A. Gasio. All rights reserved.

The contents of this website — including the editorial text, compilations, commentary, captions, photographs, screen captures, audio recordings, video recordings, the underlying HTML source code and stylesheets, the JavaScript, the SVG graphics, the embedded data structures, the document selection and arrangement, and the editorial sequencing of evidentiary exhibits — constitute the original work of the publisher and are protected as literary, pictorial, audiovisual, and compilation works under the following authorities:

  • 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. — United States Copyright Act
  • 17 U.S.C. § 102 — subject matter of copyright (literary, pictorial, audiovisual works)
  • 17 U.S.C. § 103 — compilation copyright in selection and arrangement
  • 17 U.S.C. § 106 — exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution, public display, public performance, and preparation of derivative works
  • 17 U.S.C. § 1201 — anti-circumvention of technological protection measures
  • 17 U.S.C. § 1202 — integrity of copyright management information
  • California Civil Code §§ 980–989 — state copyright protection
  • California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq. — protection against unfair business practices, including misappropriation of copyrighted compilation
  • California Penal Code § 502 — Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act
  • The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works
  • The WIPO Copyright Treaty (1996)

This site is made publicly accessible at no charge as a public-interest record. Free access does not constitute a license, transfer, or waiver of any right reserved under 17 U.S.C. § 106. No portion of the publisher’s exclusive rights is implied, granted, or extended by the act of public viewing.

Prohibited absent prior written authorization from the publisher:
  • Reproduction. Copying, downloading, scraping, mirroring, archival capture for redistribution, or republication of any portion of the site, in any medium, in any format.
  • Possession of the raw source. Saving, capturing, or retaining the underlying HTML source code, CSS stylesheets, JavaScript, SVG graphics, embedded data structures, or any technical asset comprising the site’s executable presentation. The site’s source code is a copyrighted literary work under 17 U.S.C. § 101 and § 102(a)(1). View-source inspection for fair-use commentary is permitted; possession of the source for any other purpose is not.
  • Framing, embedding, and inline display. Display of site content within a third-party page in a manner that obscures origin or substitutes for direct access (Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007)).
  • Compilation, scraping, or systematic harvesting of site content for redistribution, commercial use, ingestion into artificial-intelligence training corpora, or any derivative database.
  • Commercial use of site content in commercial publications, advertising, or commercial solicitation of any kind.
  • Circumvention of any technological protection measure in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1201, including bypass of robots.txt directives where bypass is undertaken to evade the publisher’s stated access conditions.
  • Removal or alteration of copyright management information in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1202.
Expressly permitted:
  • Direct hyperlinking to public URLs.
  • Quotation, citation, and commentary consistent with fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107 — including reporting, criticism, scholarship, judicial reference, regulatory reference, and law-enforcement reference.
  • Reproduction by courts, regulatory agencies, and law-enforcement agencies in the course of official duty.
  • Internet Archive capture for historical preservation purposes.

Primary-source documents authored by third parties — court filings, agency correspondence, recorded instruments, and other public records — are reproduced as evidentiary exhibits. The publisher does not claim copyright in those underlying public records. The publisher’s copyright extends to the editorial compilation, the commentary, the captions, the arrangement, the selection, and all original works produced by the publisher.

Enforcement:

The publisher will pursue all available legal remedies against any party who infringes the rights reserved herein. Available remedies include:

  • Statutory damages under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c) — up to $30,000 per infringed work, increased to up to $150,000 per work for willful infringement.
  • Actual damages and disgorgement of infringer’s profits under 17 U.S.C. § 504(b).
  • Injunctive relief under 17 U.S.C. § 502 — preliminary and permanent injunctions against further infringement.
  • Impoundment and disposition of infringing copies and the means of their reproduction under 17 U.S.C. § 503.
  • Attorney’s fees and costs awarded to the prevailing party under 17 U.S.C. § 505.
  • Damages for circumvention of technological protection measures under 17 U.S.C. § 1203.
  • Civil and criminal penalties under California Penal Code § 502 for unauthorized access to or copying of protected computer data.
  • Restitution and injunctive relief under California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq. for unfair business-practice misappropriation.

The publisher reserves the right to pursue any and all of the foregoing remedies, in any combination, in any forum of competent jurisdiction, with or without prior notice to the infringing party where prior notice is not required by law.

DMCA notices and counter-notices under 17 U.S.C. § 512 may be directed to the publisher in writing: gasio77@yahoo.com
Gasio v. Tran et al. · Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC · Silverstein Examination Spoke 2 · Forms Library · Final Edition · May 22, 2026 · gasio77@yahoo.com