TOP-04 — Lease Renewal Confirmations (Contract Continuity Fraud)

Executive Summary

Before issuing the fraudulent 3-day notice, the owner communicated clearly: “You lived here 3 years.” This message confirms the owner’s knowledge that the Year-3 lease term was active and valid. Despite this, the owner filed eviction claiming “no contract existed.”

Legal Significance

• Estoppel: Owner’s prior admission contradicts eviction filings.
• Contract Continuity: Year-3 lease remained active; eviction lacked basis.
• Fraudulent UD Filing: Knowing submission of false contract status.

Why This Matters at Trial

This is direct evidence of owner intent. It contradicts every statement made in Superior Court and confirms a deliberate attempt to void tenant protections unlawfully.