The Honorable Maria D. Hernandez
Presiding Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Orange

Via proper filing and service on all parties

Re: Administrative request and notice regarding evidence portal for [Case Name][Case No.]

Dear Presiding Judge Hernandez:

I amMichael Andrew Gasio, proceeding pro se and a retired 72 year old former Public School Principal / Vice Principal/ teacher. I seek administrative guidance to ensure compliance with rules against ex parte communications while preserving a clean record. I am not asking the Court to decide the merits in this letter.

Purpose

Evidence portal

URL:https://gasiomirror.com
Access: [law]
Scope: Read‑only repository with page‑level tags, hash values, and automatic version history.

The portal is organized for courtroom use and contains:

Procedural posture and timeline (condensed)

Requests for administrative direction

  1. Permission to lodge the portal URL and a read‑only offline copy with the Clerk as a courtesy copy for chambers, tied to [Case No.].
  2. Guidance on citing specific portal exhibit IDs on the record at hearings and in briefs, consistent with the California Rules of Court and local e‑filing rules.
  3. Confirmation that future updates will be noticed via service list and monthly portal digest to avoid any ex parte concern.
  4. Any additional steps the Court prefers for chain‑of‑custody or authenticity, including stipulations under Evidence Code §§ 1400–1421 or motions in limine.

Service and compliance

I certify that this letter and the portal link have been served on all counsel and parties. A current service list and tracking numbers appear below and within the portal.

RecipientRoleMethodTracking / ProofDate

Closing

I am committed to strict adherence to Court procedures. I will follow whatever filing pathway the Court directs. Thank you in advance for providing administrative guidance.

Respectfully submitted,

Michael Andrew Gasio

9432 Pier Dr Huntington Beach Ca 92646

Notice: This correspondence is intended as an administrative request regarding handling of evidence and service. It does not advocate merits, and it has been served on all parties.