Summary of Legal Irregularities and Fraud

Basis for District Attorney or Civil Court Action

• Fraudulent lease used in court: A counterfeit or misrepresented lease was submitted as official, bearing Berkshire Hathaway branding but redirecting payments to a private account.
  Ref: Yahoo Mail Doc, L19–L23
• Contradictory testimony by the owner: The landlord admitted receiving the tenant's payment outside of court, yet claimed non-payment during proceedings—grounds for perjury.
  Ref: Yahoo Mail Doc, L24–L26
• Eviction filed by unauthorized party: Silverstein Evictions initiated action without standing, as the official lease names Berkshire Hathaway as property manager.
  Ref: Yahoo Mail Doc, L12–L14
• Retaliation timeline: Eviction notice served shortly after reports to city and state inspectors about mold and construction issues.
  Ref: Yahoo Mail Doc, L1–L5
• Rent escalation used to induce displacement: Owner attempted to push rent to $7,500/month, admitted financial hardship, and circumvented CPI caps.
  Ref: Yahoo Mail Doc, L15–L19

Legal Violations Cited

• Perjury / False Claims – Penal Code §118
• Fraudulent Inducement – Civil Code §1570
• Retaliatory Eviction – Civil Code §1947.5
• Mail Fraud / Wire Fraud – 18 U.S.C. §1341, §1343
• Unauthorized Legal Action (No Standing) – CCP §367

Conclusion

These combined actions—fraud, perjury, retaliation, and filing by unauthorized parties—represent a pattern of abuse sufficient to initiate criminal or civil proceedings. This summary is structured for submission to the Orange County District Attorney and can be expanded for federal review.