DA Submission – Page 31: Lease Conflict, Early Rent Payment & Wire Fraud Evidence
Gasio v. Tran et al. – Orange County District Attorney Filing
This page documents the receipt of rent payments under one lease agreement while the property owner and agent simultaneously attempted to execute a second, conflicting contract—violating basic tenancy protection laws. The timeline and screenshots confirm:
- Rent was paid on April 19, 2024, under an agreed lease contract.
- Agent Hanson Le continued to pursue a second lease despite acknowledging payment.
- No lawful rent increase or notice of intent to terminate was delivered.
- Three-day notice followed a coercive contract setup, not legal default.
Exhibit 31A – Hanson Le Acknowledges Payment
Hanson Le acknowledges tenant payment and states, "We’re good." Despite this, no lease was recorded nor rent applied.
Exhibit 31B – Lease Extension Delayed, But Rent Accepted
Despite admitting extension was pending, Hanson acknowledges payment and fails to halt three-day eviction process.
Exhibit 31C – Attempted Double Rent Collection & Private Routing
Rent sent to private Wells Fargo account and later concealed from legal filings—indicative of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. §1343 and bank fraud under §1344.
Exhibit 31D – Rent Paid, Denied in Court
Proof of early payment was available, yet eviction proceeded. Documents were presented in court but dismissed, reinforcing pattern of concealment and retaliation.
Statutory Violations Supported by This Page:
- 18 U.S.C. §1343 – Wire Fraud (use of digital payment + concealment)
- 18 U.S.C. §1344 – Bank Fraud (routing payment off-contract then denying receipt)
- CA Civ. Code §1942.5 – Retaliatory eviction due to payment dispute
- CA Penal Code §470 – Forgery by use of altered or duplicate leases