DA43 – Coerced Payment to Private Bank Account

Violation of California Tenant Law and Federal Banking Regulations

Summary: Following the issuance of a legally questionable 3-day notice, the landlord, Phat Tran, bypassed contract procedure and demanded that the tenant deposit rent into his personal Wells Fargo account. He made this demand over the phone, stating:

“Don’t worry about the check, just put money in my account or I will kick you out.”

This occurred despite the existence of a negotiated lease agreement and the tenant’s prior payment via cashier’s check with USPS recipt—a non-cancellable, guaranteed financial instrument backed by the issuing bank of Phat Tran.

Screenshot of text regarding payment redirect
Figure A: Screenshot documenting the redirected payment request to a personal account instead of Berkshire Hathaway or escrow to the renter after 21 days.
Bank rules on cashier’s checks
Figure B: Bank guidelines confirming cashier’s checks are guaranteed by the issuing institution and not subject to standard stop payment requests sent to doctor Phat Tran by e mail.

Legal Implications

Key Evidence:

This event is a clear predicate act under RICO for wire fraud, misuse of bank instruments, and attempted illegal eviction.