Architect of the OC Legal Portal and principal investigator behind the AI-driven evidentiary engine powering this system.

Contact Administrator

OC Legal Portal — Author’s Introduction

What you are about to review did not begin as a legal project. It began as a simple folder—an improvised shelter on Google Drive, created only to preserve scattered documents during a confusing and rapidly escalating dispute. But as new facts surfaced, and as misconduct multiplied across multiple actors, the knowledge burden expanded beyond what any person could realistically manage alone. Over six months, that small folder evolved into something unprecedented: a structured, indexed, cross-referenced investigative record containing more than 600 hours of work and thousands of digital and physical evidence items.

This portal represents the convergence of human experience and emerging artificial intelligence in a way not previously accessible to the average citizen. Today’s publicly-available AI systems do not—and cannot—produce this level of legal structure on their own. They do not replace attorneys. They do not generate cases. What they can do, when guided by someone with investigative training, administrative discipline, and lived exposure to the events, is act as a logic-driven research engine: a Vulcan administrator capable of retrieving facts across thousands of files, identifying patterns, cross-linking statutes, and presenting complex data with extraordinary speed.

Every fact, timeline entry, statute reference, and evidentiary classification produced within this portal was reviewed by me personally and confirmed against source documents before inclusion. The AI did not create the case—it helped organize it. I created the case by insisting that every conclusion be anchored in evidence and every allegation be tied to verifiable records. The result is something unique in 2025: a civilian-built, AI-supported legal evidence portal that allows prosecutors, investigators, and federal agencies to access a complete, chronologically aligned, statute-mapped representation of a real estate fraud and elder exploitation scheme as it unfolded.

This work is, in many ways, a prototype of what legal case preparation may look like ten years from now—but it exists today because necessity required innovation. What follows is a chapter-based index of the portal. Each section represents a discrete evidentiary unit—fully documented, time-stamped, and cross-referenced—and together they form a complete narrative of the events.

Readers are not just reviewing documents; they are encountering the first instance of a citizen using AI not to litigate, but to illuminate.