The Gasio Mirror — A Free Press Publication
Huntington Beach, California Final Edition Friday, May 22, 2026


§ Gasio v. Tran — Case File for Counsel Review
Section 08 · Habitability
Court
Orange County Superior Court
Venue
Dept. C61 · Comm. Snuggs-Spraggins
Case Number
30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC
01 Home 02 Chronology 03 The Notice 04 Cure Tender 05 Lease & Accounts 06 Court Record 07 Agency Proceedings 08 Habitability 09 Statute Crosswalk
Court
OC Superior Court · Dept. C61
Case Number
30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC
Bench Officer
Comm. Snuggs-Spraggins
Case Type
Unlawful Detainer — Limited Civil
Property
19235 Brynn Ct, Huntington Beach 92648
Tenancy
May 2022 — Aug 5, 2024 (28 months)
Outcome
Plaintiff vacated · sealed cure tender preserved
Primary Statutes
Civ. Code §§1941.1, 1942, 1942.5, 1710, 1102 · H&S Code §17920.3
← Return to Index
Section 08 of 09 · Habitability

Habitability

Documented conditions at 19235 Brynn Court present at or before move-in on May 1, 2022 — not disclosed at listing — each anchored to a primary document.

This section presents primary documentary evidence of habitability conditions that existed at or before the commencement of the tenancy. All conditions are anchored to timestamped photographs, email records, and contractor communications. No legal conclusion is asserted. Statutory references are provided to assist counsel in identifying governing provisions.

The listing agent’s own text message on May 6, 2022 — six days after move-in — acknowledges the kitchen electrical defect as a construction issue predating the tenancy. The move-in day photograph, taken at 11:39 AM on May 1, 2022 and geotagged, documents established mold colonies before any tenancy activity could have caused them.

Overview of Pre-Existing Conditions

The property was listed in April 2022 as “NEW carpet, NEW paint, Ready to move in.” The documentary record establishes that at the time of listing the following conditions existed and were not disclosed:

ConditionLocationRoot CauseFirst Documented
Black mold colonies — established growthUnder-sink kitchen cabinetTen-year wall leak from unpermitted drain relocation (~2012)May 1, 2022 — 11:39 AM — move-in day photograph — geotagged iOS
Defective electrical outletKitchen — dishwasher plugRotted and rusted conductor from chronic moisture in same wall cavityMay 1, 2022 — dishwasher full of water on first use — email May 6, 2022
Jumped circuits / doubled conductors in wallKitchen wall cavityPrior unpermitted remodel — wiring cannot carry required loadDiscovered by contractor David Ly on repair visits 2022–2024
Active roof leak — recurring moistureBedroom ceiling above garageFailing roof assembly — wet structural studs confirmedCeiling stain photograph — contractor verbal assessment during tenancy
Rotten subfloor — non-waterproof laminate installed over itMaster bathroomPrior remodel — cosmetic covering over failing subfloorObserved during tenancy — documented at move-out
Rotten cabinet framingKitchen — dishwasher surroundTen-year moisture exposure from wall leakVisible on contractor visits — documented at move-out
Mold painted over — concealment not remediationKitchen — refrigerator wall areaPre-listing cosmetic treatment applied over active moldObserved during tenancy — eight gallons Glidden Premium paint left in garage
Governing provisions Cal. Civ. Code §1941.1 · Cal. Civ. Code §1942 · Cal. H&S Code §17920.3 · Cal. Civ. Code §1710 · Cal. Civ. Code §1102

1. The Ten-Year Drain Leak and Kitchen Mold

The Unpermitted Drain Relocation — Approximately 2012

The kitchen drain was relocated inside the wall approximately ten years before the tenancy commenced — placing the drain pipe above the dishwasher electrical outlet on the same wall stud. This modification was unpermitted. The relocated drain leaked inside the wall cavity for approximately a decade, saturating the drywall and corroding the electrical connections in the same stud bay.

The property owner, Phat L.K. Tran, has held the property since June 2005 — twenty years. He owned the property during the entire period of the drain leak and the resulting moisture accumulation.

Move-In Day Photograph — May 1, 2022 at 11:39 AM

A photograph taken by the tenants thirty-nine minutes after arriving at the property documents established black mold colonies inside the under-sink kitchen cabinet. The colonies are mature — consistent with months or years of development, not days. The mold radiates from the drain pipe connection area and covers the rear wall of the cabinet.

Exhibit HAB-001 Photograph metadata: Location — Huntington Beach, Garfield · Date — May 1, 2022 · Time — 11:39 AM · Device — iOS · Geotagged · Untouched original preserved in Google Photos. This photograph was taken before any tenancy activity could have caused the documented condition.

Prior Tenant Notice

The maturity of the mold colonies documented at 11:39 AM on move-in day indicates the condition predated the 2022 tenancy. Any prior occupant would have encountered the same condition. The property owner had constructive and likely actual prior notice of the kitchen mold before listing the property.

Pre-Listing Concealment

The listing described the property as having “NEW paint, Ready to move in.” Fresh paint was applied over existing mold in the kitchen area before listing — a cosmetic treatment that conceals but does not remediate mold. Eight gallons of Glidden Premium paint were left in the garage after the pre-listing preparation, consistent with a deliberate concealment effort across multiple affected areas.

Video Documentation — Mold and Moisture Damage Behind Dishwasher

Two short video clips, preserved by the publisher and held in the case file, document mold and moisture damage at the kitchen dishwasher and under-sink area. The first clip records the removal of the original dishwasher by a Home Depot crew and the mold present inside the under-sink cabinet area. The second clip documents black mold growth on the wall behind the dishwasher and a wet condition extending across the cabinet base — a pattern consistent with prolonged moisture exposure and matching the conditions identified in the Overview table at row 6 (rotten cabinet framing · kitchen dishwasher surround · ten-year moisture exposure from wall leak).

Exhibit HAB-013Video · ~30 sec · mold1.mp4
Home Depot removal of the original dishwasher. Mold visible inside the under-sink kitchen cabinet area as the appliance is detached.
Exhibit HAB-014Video · ~30 sec · mold2.mp4
Wall behind the removed dishwasher: visible black mold growth on the wall surface and water saturation across the wall and cabinet base, consistent with prolonged moisture exposure.
Exhibit notes · HAB-013 & HAB-014

Source: phone-recorded video, preserved by the publisher. Each clip is approximately 30 seconds in length. The original files are held off-site in the case-file repository; the references above point to the files served from this domain. The clips are presented as supplementary visual documentation of the conditions described elsewhere in this Section. No determination of liability has been made by any tribunal as to any matter discussed on this page.

2. Defective Electrical System

Day-Six Report — May 6, 2022

On May 6, 2022 — six days after move-in — tenant Michael Gasio emailed Phat Tran and forwarded a text exchange with Anna Ly documenting that the dishwasher outlet under the kitchen sink was not functioning. The dishwasher had been found full of water on its first use cycle, indicating it was tested and failed before the tenancy commenced.

“There may be a problem in the kitchen wiring — the dishwasher did not turn on and was full of water. I used an extension cord and the dishwasher is fine. The plugs above the sink on both sides don’t work. It may be just simply the fuse box. I’ll check for a fuse box today. Just wanted to give you a heads up — I know it was just finished construction.— Anna Tran Ly, Broker (DRE #01894348), text message to tenant, May 6, 2022 (emphasis added) · Exhibit HAB-002

Four Contractor Visits — David Ly, Ly Construction (License #1068334)

Contractor conflict of interest David Ly is the contractor named on Ly Construction Invoice #2412, dated August 14, 2024 — the invoice submitted in court proceedings claiming $7,835 for carpet replacement due to pet damage. He had personal knowledge of the pre-existing property conditions from four repair visits. The invoice contains no reference to the electrical, moisture, or structural conditions he personally observed. See Section 6 (Court Record).

3. Roof Leak — Bedroom Above Garage

A ceiling water stain was present in the bedroom above the garage. The oval tide-mark pattern is consistent with recurring water pooling and evaporation — multiple leak events over an extended period. Vertical streaking at the wall junction indicates water running from the ceiling accumulation point.

When David Ly was asked whether he would go into the attic to investigate the roof, he stated verbally that the property needed a whole new roof. He then applied touch-up paint to the ceiling stain rather than remediating the underlying condition. No roof work was performed during the approximately 700 days of the tenancy following that assessment. Wet structural studs were confirmed in the roof space.

Documentary note — Exhibit HAB-009 Eight gallons of Glidden Premium paint were left in the garage at move-out. Touch-up quantities for a single ceiling stain would not require eight gallons. The volume is consistent with paint-over concealment of the ceiling stain and other moisture-affected surfaces prior to listing.

4. Anna Ly — Personal Knowledge and Agency Termination

Knowledge of Pre-Existing Conditions

Anna Tran Ly — California Department of Real Estate Broker (DRE #01894348, issued January 28, 2011), individual licensee; the “Sun Realty and Management” DBA expired February 24, 2015 — served as listing agent for the 2022 tenancy. Her May 6, 2022 text message documents her personal awareness that the kitchen electrical defect was a construction issue as of day six of the tenancy. She had listed the property six days earlier as ready to move in. The mold condition visible in the May 1, 2022 move-in photograph was present in the under-sink cabinet — a location any walkthrough inspection would have included.

Written Termination of Agency — March 18, 2023

“I sent Yulia a DocuSign about 2 weeks ago. After few weeks, DocuSign is not available online. I no longer work for Phat Tran, call him directly.— Anna Ly, email to tenants, March 18, 2023 (emphasis added) · Exhibit HAB-004

Move-Out Clearance Report — August 2024

The Move-Out Clearance Report (DocuSign Envelope F5D247C2-A1A9-4991-B91F-6A333347A87D) bears Anna Ly’s electronic signature. This document was executed approximately seventeen months after her written statement that she no longer worked for Phat Tran. It claims $7,835 for carpet replacement due to pet damage on the same property whose pre-existing defects Anna Ly had personally observed and documented.

Governing provisions Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §10130 · Cal. Civ. Code §2355 (termination of agency) · Cal. Civ. Code §1950.5

5. Property Condition at Move-Out — August 5, 2024

The invoice sequence City of Huntington Beach inspector confirms no pet damage: July 27, 2024. Ly Construction Invoice #2412 dated for “carpet replacement due to dog pee bad smell”: August 14, 2024 — eighteen days later. David Ly, the named contractor on the invoice, visited the property four times during the tenancy and saw the carpet on each visit.

5.5 Mid-Tenancy Removal of Contracted Gardener Service — HOA Delegated Maintenance Obligation Directly to Tenant

The April 26, 2024 lease required the landlord to provide gardener service as part of contracted property maintenance. The homeowners’ association at 19235 Brynn Court mandates yard maintenance as a condition of property compliance. Mid-tenancy, the landlord stopped paying for the gardener service. The yard fell out of HOA-mandated condition.

The HOA approached the plaintiff directly. The HOA representative gave the plaintiff a push mower and told him, in substance, that since he lived at the property, he should take care of the yard. The HOA delegated the maintenance obligation directly to the tenant because the landlord had defaulted on it. The plaintiff, then in his early 70s and wearing a cardiac monitor, performed the yard maintenance himself for the remainder of the tenancy.

The same homeowners’ association holds documentary evidence that Phat L.K. Tran was at that time approximately one year in arrears on his HOA dues. A landlord one year delinquent on his HOA dues, while simultaneously raising rent on his tenants by 7%, hiring a property manager who routed rent to a personal Wells Fargo account, and filing an unlawful detainer for nonpayment of the very rent the tenants had documented in writing they had paid, is a landlord under financial pressure. The financial pressure provides the motive context for the rent escalation, the broker substitution, the cure-window concealment, and the prosecution of the unlawful detainer.

Subpoena targets — HOA records

6. Statutory Framework

StatuteProvisionApplication to this record
Cal. Civ. Code §1941.1Landlord duty to maintain habitable conditionsMold, defective electrical, roof leak — all present at commencement of tenancy
Cal. Civ. Code §1942Tenant repair and deductDishwasher failure reported — landlord refused repair in writing — tenant purchased replacement — net balance tendered as cashier’s check
Cal. Civ. Code §1942.5Retaliatory eviction presumptionHabitability complaint co-signed by household — eviction proceedings initiated within 180-day window
Cal. H&S Code §17920.3Uninhabitable conditions — mold, dampness, defective electrical, structural decayMold documented at move-in — defective wiring — wet structural studs — rotten cabinet framing — rotten subfloor
Cal. Civ. Code §1710Fraudulent nondisclosureKnown mold painted over before listing — known electrical defects undisclosed — property listed as ready to move in
Cal. Civ. Code §1102Material disclosure requirementOwner of 20 years had knowledge of drain relocation, leak, mold, and electrical defects — none disclosed at listing
Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §10176Misrepresentation by licensed agentAnna Ly listed property as ready to move in with personal knowledge of construction defects confirmed by her own day-six text
Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §7090 (CSLB)Contractor discipline — failure to disclose dangerous conditionDavid Ly observed dangerous electrical conditions on four visits — no written disclosure — submitted invoice claiming unrelated damage

7. Primary Documents — This Section

All primary documents are available in the Google Drive repository. Originals are untouched. Full evidence portal: gasiomirror.com

Scope and methodology. This section presents only what appears in primary documents available for inspection. No statement on this page characterizes any individual as having committed a crime; criminal liability is determined by qualified prosecutors and courts. Statutory citations are provided to assist counsel in identifying the legal frameworks that govern the documented conduct.

Notice to reader · scope and disclaimers

This site is a public-interest case file assembled and published by Michael A. Gasio, plaintiff pro se in Gasio v. Tran et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC. The plaintiff is not an attorney. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice.

Every factual assertion is drawn from primary documents — executed contracts, bank records, emails, text messages, court filings, public licensing records, and public-records directory entries — preserved in the case file and referenced by source and date.

No statement should be read as a determination that any named person has committed a crime, violated a statute, or breached a professional duty. Those determinations are reserved to qualified counsel, regulatory agencies, and the courts. No finding has been made.

This publication is made in the exercise of rights protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 2 of the California Constitution, California Civil Code § 47(d), and the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.

Caption
Gasio v. Tran et al.
30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC
Publication
The Gasio Mirror
A Free Press Publication
Discipline
Documentary record · allegation framing throughout · no finding has been made
Inquiries
Coded by Black Diamond Project 2026 ™ · version 5.5
gasiomirror.com · © 1996–2026 · Plaintiffs: Michael & Yulia Gasio
§Publisher’s Notice & Copyright Reservation

gasiomirror.com is published as press under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution of the State of California. The publisher is the author. Editorial control rests with the publisher.

The publisher selects what is published, when, and for how long. Prior editions are not retained on this site for public access — no more than any newspaper or magazine retains its back issues on its racks.

Historical preservation is the work of the Internet Archive, an independent institution. If back issues of this publication exist, they exist there, outside the publisher’s hands. The publisher makes no representation about what any prior edition contained or whether any particular edition was captured.

Source documents are not held here. They are held by the Orange County Superior Court (Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC) and by the regulatory agencies catalogued under Agency Proceedings. Inquiries about source documents belong with them.

©Copyright Reservation

© 1996–2026 Michael A. Gasio. All rights reserved.

The contents of this website — including the editorial text, compilations, commentary, captions, photographs, screen captures, audio recordings, video recordings, the underlying HTML source code and stylesheets, the JavaScript, the SVG graphics, the embedded data structures, the document selection and arrangement, and the editorial sequencing of evidentiary exhibits — constitute the original work of the publisher and are protected as literary, pictorial, audiovisual, and compilation works under the following authorities:

This site is made publicly accessible at no charge as a public-interest record. Free access does not constitute a license, transfer, or waiver of any right reserved under 17 U.S.C. § 106. No portion of the publisher’s exclusive rights is implied, granted, or extended by the act of public viewing.

Prohibited absent prior written authorization from the publisher:

The publisher reserves all rights not expressly granted herein under 17 U.S.C. § 106 and corresponding California, Berne Convention, and WIPO authorities.